ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024
Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: a complete workflow pilot feasibility study.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilisation of table-mounted versus floor-mounted robotic systems for thoracolumbar fusion: a before-and-after institutional experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted versus conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study on total and hidden blood loss.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Enhancing precision in robotic navigated minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a streamlined surgical workflow: a technical note.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the feasibility of pinless robot-assisted spine surgery: a prospective study of 750 cases and 3,924 screws in the thoracolumbar spine in India.Asian spine journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of robotic AI-assisted and manual pedicle screw fixation for treating thoracolumbar fractures: a retrospective controlled trial.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution. Methods: Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes. Results: Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.