Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816715›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

Cementless fixation in total joint arthroplasty: Factors impacting osseointegration.

Sravya P Vajapey, Vivek M Shah, Mengnai Li, Daniel M Estok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: Why, when, and how.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sravya P VajapeyOrthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vivek M ShahOrthopedic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Mengnai LiOrthopedic Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniel M EstokOrthopedic Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•The success of cementless fixation in TJA depends on a multitude of factors including biological, mechanical, implant, surgical, and material properties.•Biologic fixation has become the primary mode of fixation for the majority of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgeries done today in the United States (US) due to its low complication rate and superior longevity compared to cemented fixation.•Cementless fixation has yet to gain wider acceptance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and hip hemiarthroplasty due to several factors including host bone quality, implant design, and surgical technique.•Understanding a) the properties of the different biomaterials, b) the bone-implant interface characteristics of the different ingrowth and ongrowth surfaces, and c) the various factors that affect osseointegration can lead to:i)appropriate choice of implants for individual patients with consequent increase in revision-free survival, andii)the development of new techniques that can reduce the risk of aseptic loosening.

Identifiers

PMID39816715
PMCPMC11732076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.