Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816709›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Comparing Tibiofemoral Rotation Measurements Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

Lukas Jud, Alexander Berger, Martin Hartmann, Lazaros Vlachopoulos, Jakob Ackermann, Sandro F Fucentese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconsideration of radiographic axial imaging techniques for the evaluation of patellofemoral alignment: skyline view vs. merchant view.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas JudDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-3927
Alexander BergerDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin HartmannDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lazaros VlachopoulosDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jakob AckermannDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sandro F FucenteseDepartment of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tibiofemoral rotation is an emerging parameter, especially in assessing patellofemoral instability. However, reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality and do not consider the effect of knee flexion during image acquisition. Purpose: To analyze the differences in tibiofemoral rotation measurements between computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 78 knees in 72 patients were included. All patients underwent surgery for patellofemoral instability at our institution and preoperative CT and MRI were available. Tibiofemoral rotation was measured on axial CT and MRI, whereas the respective knee flexion angle (KFA) was measured on sagittal images. Tibiofemoral rotation values in which the tibia was externally rotated to the femur were handled as positive values. Differences between CT and MRI measurements were calculated and the association between KFA and tibiofemoral rotation was evaluated using Pearson correlation and the Mann-Whitney Results: The mean tibiofemoral rotation was 8.7°± 5.5° in CT and 4.2°± 6.7° in MRI ( Conclusion: Tibiofemoral rotation measurements significantly differed between CT and MRI, with larger values observed in CT. The difference between imaging modalities correlated with the degree of knee flexion during image acquisition. This observation should be considered when assessing tibiofemoral rotation, as current reference values in the literature are inconsistent regarding the used imaging modality.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentkneeknee rotationknee versionosteotomypatellapatellofemoral instabilitytrochlear dysplasia

Identifiers

PMID39816709
PMCPMC11733878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.