Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816672›Full record

ReviewCurrent pediatrics reports2024

Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery in Pediatric Patients.

Tam T Doan, Charles Puelz, Craig Rusin, Silvana Molossi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current pediatrics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tam T DoanCoronary Artery Anomalies Program, Division of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6651 Main Street MC-E1920, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Charles PuelzDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Craig RusinDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Silvana MolossiCoronary Artery Anomalies Program, Division of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, 6651 Main Street MC-E1920, Houston, TX 77030 USA.

Funding

Multi-Site Validation Study of the HLHS Arrest PredictorR01HL142994 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI RUSIN, CRAIG G · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: We present a contemporary approach to risk assessment and management of patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA). Recent Findings: Anomalous left coronary artery from the right aortic sinus (L-AAOCA) with interarterial course carries a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD); therefore, current guidelines recommend exercise restriction and surgical intervention. Recent data in intraseptal and juxtacommissural L-AAOCA showed inducible perfusion abnormalities, leading to consideration of surgical intervention. Anomalous right coronary artery from the left aortic sinus (R-AAOCA) carries a much lower risk and stress perfusion imaging is helpful in identifying patients with inducible ischemia. Perfusion abnormalities resolve following successful surgical intervention of AAOCA. Computational modeling techniques identifying risk features shows promise in the evaluation of AAOCA. Summary: Stress perfusion imaging is helpful in assessing AAOCA upon presentation and following surgical intervention. Computational modeling has potential in bridging knowledge gaps in AAOCA. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40124-024-00317-7.

Indexed as

Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary arteryChildrenComputational modelingInducible myocardial ischemiaSudden cardiac arrestSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID39816672
PMCPMC11729077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.