ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
From innovation to clinic: Emerging strategies harnessing electrically conductive polymers to enhance electrically stimulated peripheral nerve repair.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multifunctional MOF-mineralized conductive hydrogel coating on zinc implants orchestrates neuro-osteogenic coupling for enhanced bone defect repair.Bioactive materials · 2027Article
- Immuno-engineered conductive hydrogels: Bridging neural signaling and microenvironmental remodeling for neural repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- From trade-offs to translation: An interdisciplinary roadmap for neurotechnology.Science advances · 2026Review
- Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- PEDOT: PSS for Implantable and Wearable Bioelectronics: From Material Engineering and Energy Storage to Clinical Translation.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- PEDOT:PSS in peripheral nerve injury repair: electrical stimulation, neural interfaces, and neural regenerative mechanisms.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Electrochemical modulation of host-microbe dynamics in wound healing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Adhesive-Electrocoupling Hydrogels for Tissue Regeneration: Design, Mechanisms, and Perspectives.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Multidimensional advances in neural interface technology for peripheral nerve repair: From material innovation to clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Biphasic Electrical Stimulation of Schwann Cells on Conducting Polymer-Coated Carbon Microfibers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Collagen supplementation and regenerative health: advances in biomarker detection and smart material integration.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Review on electrical stimulation combined with electroactive biomaterials to promote peripheral nerve regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve repair (PNR) is a major healthcare challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity of the nervous system, often leading to severe functional impairments. While nerve autografts are the gold standard, their implications are constrained by issues such as donor site morbidity and limited availability, necessitating innovative alternatives like nerve guidance conduits (NGCs). However, the inherently slow nerve growth rate (∼1 mm/day) and prolonged neuroinflammation, delay recovery even with the use of passive (no-conductive) NGCs, resulting in muscle atrophy and loss of locomotor function. Electrical stimulation (ES) has the ability to enhance nerve regeneration rate by modulating the innate bioelectrical microenvironment of nerve tissue while simultaneously fostering a reparative environment through immunoregulation. In this context, electrically conductive polymer (ECP)-based biomaterials offer unique advantages for nerve repair combining their flexibility, akin to traditional plastics, and mixed ionic-electronic conductivity, similar to ionically conductive nerve tissue, as well as their biocompatibility and ease of fabrication. This review focuses on the progress, challenges, and emerging techniques for integrating ECP based NGCs with ES for functional nerve regeneration. It critically evaluates the various approaches using ECP based scaffolds, identifying gaps that have hindered clinical translation. Key challenges discussed include designing effective 3D NGCs with high electroactivity, optimizing ES modules, and better understanding of immunoregulation during nerve repair. The review also explores innovative strategies in material development and wireless, self-powered ES methods. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for non-invasive ES delivery methods combined with hybrid ECP based neural scaffolds, highlighting future directions for advancing preclinical and clinical translation. Together, ECP based NGCs combined with ES represent a promising avenue for advancing PNR and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.