Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816667›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

From innovation to clinic: Emerging strategies harnessing electrically conductive polymers to enhance electrically stimulated peripheral nerve repair.

Rajiv Borah, Daniel Diez Clarke, Jnanendra Upadhyay, Michael G Monaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Engineering Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Neural Repair.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rajiv BorahDiscipline of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Daniel Diez ClarkeDiscipline of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Jnanendra UpadhyayDepartment of Physics, Dakshin Kamrup College, Kamrup, Assam, 781125, India.
Michael G MonaghanDiscipline of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve repair (PNR) is a major healthcare challenge due to the limited regenerative capacity of the nervous system, often leading to severe functional impairments. While nerve autografts are the gold standard, their implications are constrained by issues such as donor site morbidity and limited availability, necessitating innovative alternatives like nerve guidance conduits (NGCs). However, the inherently slow nerve growth rate (∼1 mm/day) and prolonged neuroinflammation, delay recovery even with the use of passive (no-conductive) NGCs, resulting in muscle atrophy and loss of locomotor function. Electrical stimulation (ES) has the ability to enhance nerve regeneration rate by modulating the innate bioelectrical microenvironment of nerve tissue while simultaneously fostering a reparative environment through immunoregulation. In this context, electrically conductive polymer (ECP)-based biomaterials offer unique advantages for nerve repair combining their flexibility, akin to traditional plastics, and mixed ionic-electronic conductivity, similar to ionically conductive nerve tissue, as well as their biocompatibility and ease of fabrication. This review focuses on the progress, challenges, and emerging techniques for integrating ECP based NGCs with ES for functional nerve regeneration. It critically evaluates the various approaches using ECP based scaffolds, identifying gaps that have hindered clinical translation. Key challenges discussed include designing effective 3D NGCs with high electroactivity, optimizing ES modules, and better understanding of immunoregulation during nerve repair. The review also explores innovative strategies in material development and wireless, self-powered ES methods. Furthermore, it emphasizes the need for non-invasive ES delivery methods combined with hybrid ECP based neural scaffolds, highlighting future directions for advancing preclinical and clinical translation. Together, ECP based NGCs combined with ES represent a promising avenue for advancing PNR and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Conductive polymerElectrical stimulation (ES)Nerve guidance conduit (NGC)Nerve repairOptoelectronic stimulation (OptoES)Photovoltaic biomaterialsWireless electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39816667
PMCPMC11733191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.