Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry2024

Exit interviews from two randomised placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with caregivers of young children with autism spectrum disorder.

Natalia Hawken, Bruno Falissard, Carl Choquet, Clement Francois, Jean Tardu, Ramona Schmid

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03715153 phase3terminatednot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Bumetanide Oral Liquid Formulation in Children Aged From 2 to Less Than 7 Years Old With Autism Spectrum Disorder. A 6-month Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Multicentre Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Bumetanide 0.5mg Twice a Day Followed by an Open Label Active 6-month Treatment Period With Bumetanide (0.5mg Twice a Day) and a 6 Weeks Discontinuation Period After Treatment Stop.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Recherches Internationales ServierRan2018 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)ArmsBUMETANIDE (S95008) for week 0 - 26, PLACEBO for week 0 - 26, Open-Label BUMETANIDE (S95008) for weeks 26 - 52
NCT03715166 phase3terminatednot on this map

A 6-month Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Multicentre Parallel Group Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Bumetanide 0.5mg Twice a Day Followed by an Open Label Active 6-month Treatment Period With Bumetanide (0.5mg Twice a Day) and a 6 Weeks Discontinuation Period After Treatment Stop.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de Recherches Internationales ServierRan2018 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)ArmsBumetanide Oral Solution, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalia HawkenHTA Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Bruno FalissardEpidemiology Department, CESP/INSERM U1018, Psychiatrie du Développement et Trajectoires, Paris, France.
Carl ChoquetIM Franchise Department, Les Laboratoires SERVIER, Global Value, Access & Pricing, Suresnes, France.
Clement FrancoisHTA Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Jean TarduHTA Department, Creativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Ramona SchmidIM Franchise Department, Les Laboratoires SERVIER, Global Value, Access & Pricing, Suresnes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterised by difficulty with social communication and restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour. This study aimed to improve understanding of the ASD patient experience with the treatment (bumetanide) regarding the changes in core symptoms and to assess changes considered as meaningful. To achieve this, qualitative interviews were conducted with caregivers of patients in two phase 3 clinical trials (NCT03715153; NCT03715166) of a novel ASD treatment. Methods: Caregivers were invited to participate in one interview after completion of the pivotal phase 3 study; for those of them who continued treatment after study completion, a second interview was held 3 months after trial completion. The interviews were conducted by qualitative researchers and followed a semi-structured interview guide. The interviews focused on patients' ASD symptoms and their impact on their daily life before enrolment, and on any symptom changes patients experienced during the trial. Results: Out of the 13 eligible patients' caregivers, 11 were interviewed up to two times at clinical sites in the UK, Spain, and Italy. The caregivers reported impairments in a wide range of skills: deficits in communication and social interaction; restricted, repetitive patterns of behaviour, interests, or activities; and cognitive, emotional, and motor impairments. Compared to before the trial initiation, caregivers also reported improvements in the following domains: communication, interaction with others, cognition, aggression, emotions, repetitive movements, eating, and sleeping. Conclusion: The exit interviews provided a rich source of qualitative data, allowing a deeper understanding of caregivers' and patients' experience of the disease and allowing us to understand what constitutes a meaningful change. These data also helped identify important experiences that may inform the patient-reported outcome measurement strategy for future trials in ASD.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderbumetanidecaregiversexit interviewspatient experiencepatient-reported outcomesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39816573
PMCPMC11731980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.