ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Study on Visual Quality After Cataract Surgery and Goniosynechialysis in Patients with Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma and Cataracts.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the visual quality in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) complicated by cataracts after cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and goniosynechialysis, and to explore the relationship between pupil size and visual quality. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomized study was conducted, including 65 PACG patients (75 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation and goniosynechialysis from July 2021 to June 2023, as well as a control group of cataract-only patients. Visual quality was evaluated using objective and subjective methods at least 3 months postoperatively. PACG patients were divided into large-pupil (≥5 mm) and normal-pupil (<5 mm) groups. Visual quality parameters were compared among groups, and correlations between pupil size and objective visual quality measures were analyzed. Results: Visual Parameters: The large-pupil PACG group showed significantly higher higher-order aberrations, including coma and spherical aberrations, compared to both the cataract and normal-pupil groups. Contrast sensitivity was also worse in the large-pupil group. Visual Quality Questionnaire: The large-pupil group reported higher scores for night glare and difficulty driving at night. Correlations: Pupil size was positively correlated with higher-order aberrations and negatively correlated with contrast sensitivity. Conclusion: Pupil dilation is a major factor affecting postoperative visual quality in PACG patients, even after surgery. Larger pupil size significantly increases higher-order aberrations and reduces contrast sensitivity. Techniques like pupil suturing may help improve visual quality in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.