Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816413›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in antibiotics2022

Antimicrobial resistance in fish and poultry: Public health implications for animal source food production in Nigeria, Egypt, and South Africa.

Ekemini M Okon, Reuben C Okocha, Babatunde T Adesina, Judith O Ehigie, Olayinka O Alabi, Adeniran M Bolanle, N Matekwe, Babatunde M Falana, Adebisi M Tiamiyu, Isaac O Olatoye and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in antibiotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ekemini M OkonDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Reuben C OkochaDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Babatunde T AdesinaDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Judith O EhigieICBAS - School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Olayinka O AlabiDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Adeniran M BolanleDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
N MatekweDepartment of Agriculture Environmental Affairs, Rural Development and Land Reform, Veterinary Services, Cape Town, South Africa.
Babatunde M FalanaDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agricultural Sciences, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria.
Adebisi M TiamiyuDepartment of Biosciences and Biotechnology, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo City, Ondo State, Nigeria.
Isaac O OlatoyeDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Olufemi B AdedejiDepartment of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant threat to global public health. Specifically, excessive usage of antimicrobials in food animal production is one significant reason for AMR development in humans. Therefore, it is essential to identify the trends of AMR in fish and poultry and develop better surveillance strategies for the future. Despite this imperative need, such information is not well documented, especially in Africa. This study used a systematic review to assess AMR trend, spatial distribution, and incidence in fish and poultry research in Nigeria, Egypt, and South Africa. A literature assessment was conducted for published studies on AMR between 1989 and 2021 using the Scopus and Web of Science databases. One hundred and seventy-three relevant articles were obtained from the database search. Egypt was the leading exponent of antimicrobial resistance research (43.35%, 75 studies), followed by Nigeria (39.31%, 68 studies), then South Africa (17.34%, 30 studies). The majority of the antimicrobial resistance studies were on poultry in Egypt (81%, 61 studies), Nigeria (87%, 59 studies), and South Africa (80%, 24 studies). Studies on fish were 17% (13 studies), 9% (6 studies), and 10% (3 studies) in Egypt, Nigeria, and South Africa, respectively. Antimicrobial resistance patterns showed multiple drug resistance and variations in resistant genes. AMR research focused on sulfamethoxazole groups, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, tetracycline, erythromycin, and ampicillin. Most studies employed the disk diffusion method for antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Among the four mechanisms of AMR, limiting drug uptake was the most reported in this study (both in fish and poultry). The findings reveal public and environmental health threats and suggest that it would be useful to promote and advance AMR research, particularly for countries on the global hotspot for antimicrobial use.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobialsone healthpublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39816413
PMCPMC11732016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.