Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in antibiotics2022

Gaps in the implementation of national core elements for sustainable antimicrobial use in the WHO-African region.

Walter L Fuller, Aaron O Aboderin, Ali Yahaya, Adeyemi T Adeyemo, Laetitia Gahimbare, Otridah Kapona, Omotayo T Hamzat, Oumar Bassoum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in antibiotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Walter L FullerAssistant Regional Director Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Aaron O AboderinDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Ali YahayaAssistant Regional Director Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Adeyemi T AdeyemoDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Laetitia GahimbareAssistant Regional Director Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Otridah KaponaZambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
Omotayo T HamzatLaboratory Systems and Network, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka, Zambia.
Oumar BassoumFaculté de Médecine, de Pharmacie et d'Odontologie, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar-Fann, Senegal.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a leading global health and economic threat of the 21st century, with Africa bearing the greatest burden of mortality from drug-resistant infections. Optimization of the use of antimicrobials is a core strategic element of the response to AMR, addressing misuse and overuse as primary drivers. Effectively, this requires the whole society comprising not only healthcare professionals but also the public, as well as the government, to engage in a bottom-up and a top-down approach. We determined the progress of African national governments in optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Methods: From September 2021 to June 2022, all 47 member states of the World Health Organization African region (WHO AFRO) were invited to participate in a survey determining the implementation of strategies to optimize antimicrobial use (AMU). We used the WHO antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) assessment tool, Results: Thirty-one (66%) of the 47 countries returned completed forms. Only eight (25.8%) countries have developed a national AMS implementation policy incorporating defined goals, targets, and operational plans. There are no budget lines for AMS activities in 23 (74.2%) countries. The WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification of optimizing AMU has been integrated into the national essential medicines list or formulary in 19 (61.3%) countries, while the incorporation of the AMS principles and WHO AWaRe classification into national clinical guidelines for the management of infections is present in only 12 (38.7%) and 11 (34.5%) countries, respectively. Although regulations on the prescription-only sale/dispensing of antibiotics are present in 68% of countries, their enforcement is poor. Systems identifying pathogens and antibiotic susceptibility for optimal use of antibiotics are lacking in 38% of countries. Conclusion: In Africa, wide gaps exist in the governments' implementation of the core elements of optimizing antimicrobial drug use. Responding to AMR constitutes a long journey, and technical and financial support needs to be deployed to optimize the use of antimicrobials.

Indexed as

AMS programsantimicrobial stewardshipAWaRe classificationnational core elementssurveyWHO-AFRO

Identifiers

PMID39816403
PMCPMC11732132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.