ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024
The impact of a communal multidisciplinary tumour board on medical education.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DEGRO consensus framework for undergraduate radiation therapy teaching in Germany: a white paper with integrated guidance on artificial intelligence in medical education.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Numerous challenges hinder the development of multidisciplinary medical education in a resource-constrained environment. Communal tumour boards built through networking could be a suitable model for the effective management of diseases and enhancement of medical education. This study evaluated the impact of an integrated care pathway for patients with musculoskeletal tumours via multi-institutional networking in a metropolis. Methodology: Musculoskeletal tumours managed in different institutions in a large metropolis were included for discussion at monthly meetings, under the aegis of the Lagos Musculoskeletal Oncology Network (LAMON). The cases discussed were collated and presented by designated senior residents. The meetings ensured adherence to agreed national and international guidelines in the management of musculoskeletal tumours. Decisions about the treatment modalities were planned at the meetings. The impact on medical residency training was evaluated using the achievement of significant milestones by the residents supported by the network. Results: The tumour board network included health professionals from various specialist hospitals in the metropolis. Within the decade (2013-2022), 1,272 patients were reviewed of which 968 patients had definitive histological diagnoses. There was an improvement in limb salvage rate and disease outcome. The tumour board supported significant milestones in graduate medical training, including the completion of 4 residents' fellowship dissertations, 22 conference presentations by residents, the publication of 12 articles by residents and the completion of an orthopaedic oncology subspecialty fellowship by 9 orthopaedic surgeons. Conclusion: The tumour board/network improved the outcome of musculoskeletal tumours over the study period. The network improved the education of medical doctors and increased the capacity for training newer instructors in a resource-limited environment. Perhaps with appropriate social and corporate support, communal tumour boards like LAMON may translate into a good model for multidisciplinary care of diseases and capacity building in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.