Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816387›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024

Outcomes following CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas-a large single-centre study.

Kamran Saeed, Kaynat Siddiqui, Hafiza Fatima Aziz, Fatima Shaukat, Shazia Kadri, Aneeta Ghulam Muhammad, Aneela Darbar, Tariq Mahmood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kamran SaeedCyberknife and Tomotherapy Center, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
Kaynat SiddiquiDr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi 74700, Pakistan.
Hafiza Fatima AzizDr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi 74700, Pakistan.
Fatima ShaukatCyberknife and Tomotherapy Center, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
Shazia KadriCyberknife and Tomotherapy Center, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
Aneeta Ghulam MuhammadCyberknife and Tomotherapy Center, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi 75510, Pakistan.
Aneela DarbarThe Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Tariq MahmoodCyberknife and Tomotherapy Center, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JPMC), Karachi 75510, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in pituitary adenomas (PAs) is evolving especially considering its safety. Existing literature is hampered by limited sample sizes and short-term follow-ups, impeding its preeminence in the clinical and radiological outcomes. We propose a comprehensive, single-centred study to evaluate the outcomes following CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (CK SRS) for PAs in a larger patient population, incorporating meticulous clinical and radiological follow-up. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 278 cases of PAs that underwent CK SRS from 2013 to 2021. Based on their endocrinology profile, they were classified as functional adenomas (FA) and non-functional adenomas (NFA). We assessed pre and post-CK SRS clinical, visual, hormonal and radiological parameters and the associated toxicity. Where applicable, data were compared using the Independent t-test, chi-square test, Fisher Exact and Mann-Whitney Results: The median age of the patients was 40.13 ± 12.61 years (111 female and 167 male patients). The median prescribed radiosurgery dose was 25.0 ± 5.0 Gy into 3 or 5 fractions. The median follow-up time was 12 months (IQR 20). Data were grouped into NFA (169, 60.8%) and FA (109, 39.2%). After adjusting for patients lost to follow-up, post-CK SRS visual perimetry improved in 80.4% of patients and tumour size reduced in 78.6% of the study population. Seventeen patients with NFA and nine with FA manifested new-onset hormonal deficiencies. No statistically significant differences were seen in post-CK SRS visual outcomes and hormone deficiency groups. Conclusion: CK SRS is effective and safe for managing PAs, achieving tumour control and preserving visual function with minimal toxicity. Extended follow-up is needed to evaluate post-SRS toxicity and hypopituitarism.

Indexed as

acromegalyCushing’s diseaseCyberKnifenonfunctional adenomaspituitary adenomasradiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID39816387
PMCPMC11735123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.