Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816348›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimal extreme learning machine for diagnosing brain tumor based on modified sailfish optimizer.

Saad Ali Amin, Mashal Kasem Sulieman Alqudah, Saleh Ateeq Almutairi, Rasha Almajed, Mohammad Rustom Al Nasar, Hamzah Ali Alkhazaleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saad Ali AminCollege of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Academic City, 14143, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mashal Kasem Sulieman AlqudahDigital Transformation & Information Programs Department, Institute of Public Administration, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh Ateeq AlmutairiApplied College, Computer Science, And Information Department, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha AlmajedCollege of Computer Information Technology (CCIT), Department of Information Technology Management, American University in the Emirates (AUE), Academic City, 14143, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammad Rustom Al NasarCollege of Computer Information Technology (CCIT), Department of Information Technology Management, American University in the Emirates (AUE), Academic City, 14143, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Hamzah Ali AlkhazalehCollege of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Academic City, 14143, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a hierarchical automated methodology for detecting brain tumors in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), focusing on preprocessing images to improve quality and eliminate artifacts or noise. A modified Extreme Learning Machine is then used to diagnose brain tumors that are integrated with the Modified Sailfish optimizer to enhance its performance. The Modified Sailfish optimizer is a metaheuristic algorithm known for efficiently navigating optimization landscapes and enhancing convergence speed. Experiments were conducted using the "Whole Brain Atlas (WBA)" database, which contains annotated MRI images. The results showed superior efficiency in accurately detecting brain tumors from MRI images, demonstrating the potential of the method in enhancing accuracy and efficiency. The proposed method utilizes hierarchical methodology, preprocessing techniques, and optimization of the Extreme Learning Machine with the Modified Sailfish optimizer to improve accuracy rates and decrease the time needed for brain tumor diagnosis. The proposed method outperformed other methods in terms of accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, and F1 score in medical imaging diagnosis. It achieved the highest accuracy at 93.95 %, with End/End and CNN attaining high values of 89.24 % and 93.17 %, respectively. The method also achieved a perfect score of 100 % in recall, 91.38 % in specificity, and 75.64 % in F1 score. However, it is crucial to consider factors like computational complexity, dataset characteristics, and generalizability before evaluating the effectiveness of the method in medical imaging diagnosis. This approach has the potential to make substantial contributions to medical imaging and aid healthcare professionals in making prompt and precise treatment decisions for brain tumors.

Indexed as

Automated methodBrain tumorComputer-aided detection systemExtreme learning machine (ELM)Modified sailfish optimizerMRI images

Identifiers

PMID39816348
PMCPMC11733978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.