Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816343›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Understanding level of Chinese traffic signage among children aged 7-11 years: A pilot study.

Qingjun Han, Noorhayati Saad, Kamarudzaman Md Isa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qingjun HanThe Design School, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Noorhayati SaadThe Design School, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Kamarudzaman Md IsaThe Design School, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Road traffic injuries are one of the main causes of death among children. In recent years, the incidence and casualty rates of traffic accidents have increased year by year, which is a major challenge faced by safety organizations and governments in various countries, especially in developing countries. Among them, correct understanding of road traffic signs is a factor in reducing accidents. Therefore, identifying traffic signs has become an important indicator of road safety education. This study aimed to understand the understanding level of existing road traffic signs among Chinese children aged 7-11. 30 children aged 7-11 from Guangzhou participated in this study. The working title "Traffic Signage understanding Test questionnaire" was used as the tool for data collection. The questionnaire measured three aspects of child road users' understanding, including verbal label, action and consequences. Three experts in child psychology and cognition reviewed the questionnaire and validated its face and content. The survey results show that compared with actions and consequences, children have a lower understanding of verbal labels of signs, but overall, most children understand traffic signs incorrectly or do not understand them. This is statistically significant in reducing China's road traffic casualty rate. It is also recommended to design traffic signs that are suitable for children to understand.

Indexed as

ChildrenTraffic signageUnderstanding level

Identifiers

PMID39816343
PMCPMC11734131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.