Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816342›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Automated analysis for glaucoma screening of retinal videos acquired with smartphone-based ophthalmoscope.

Fabio Scarpa, Alexa Berto, Nikos Tsiknakis, Georgios Manikis, Dimitrios I Fotiadis, Kostas Marias, Alberto Scarpa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fabio ScarpaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Alexa BertoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, 35131, Italy.
Nikos TsiknakisInstitute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, 70013, Greece.
Georgios ManikisInstitute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, 70013, Greece.
Dimitrios I FotiadisDepartment of Biomedical Research, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, FORTH, Ioannina, 45115, Greece.
Kostas MariasInstitute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, 70013, Greece.
Alberto ScarpaD-Eye Srl, Padova, 35131, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread screening is crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma, the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. The development of portable technologies, such as smartphone-based ophthalmoscopes, able to image the optical nerve head, represents a resource for large-scale glaucoma screening. Indeed, they consist of an optical device attached to a common smartphone, making the overall device cheap and easy to use. Automated analyses able to assist clinicians are crucial for fast, reproducible, and accurate screening, and can promote its diffusion making it possible even for non-expert ophthalmologists. Images acquired with smartphone ophthalmoscopes differ from that acquired with a fundus camera for the field of view, noise, colour, and the presence of pupil, iris and eyelid. Consequently, algorithms specifically designed for this type of image need to be developed. We propose a completely automated analysis of retinal video acquired with smartphone ophthalmoscopy. The proposed algorithm, based on convolutional neural networks, selects the most relevant frames in the video, segments both optic disc and cup, and computes the cup-to-disc ratio. The developed networks were partially trained on images from a publicly available fundus camera datasets, modified through an original procedure to be statistically equal to the ones acquired with a smartphone ophthalmoscope. The proposed algorithm achieves good results in images acquired from healthy and pathological subjects. Indeed, an accuracy ≥95 % was obtained for both disc and cup segmentation and the computed cup-to-disc ratios denote good agreement with manual analysis (mean difference 9 %), allowing a substantial differentiation between healthy and pathological subjects.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic cup segmentationOptic disc segmentationSmartphone ophthalmoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39816342
PMCPMC11734129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.