ArticleHeliyon2024
Consumer attitudes, barriers and facilitators to sharing clinical data for research purposes: Results from a focus group synthesis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives on Health Data Sharing Among Patients With Somatic and Mental Health Diseases: Focus Group Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Opportunities and risks associated with external comparator cohorts in clinical drug development in hematology.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current research into the digital healthcare landscape reveals a significant gap in understanding the perspectives of consumers with lived health experiences on sharing their health data for research purposes. Despite the substantial value that such shared information can bring to healthcare research, policy development, and system improvement, insights into the attitudes and willingness of these consumers towards data sharing remain sparse. This study seeks to fill this gap, exploring the unique views of these individuals and assessing the potential benefits their data sharing could contribute to healthcare. Utilising three focus groups, this qualitative study engaged 25 consumers with chronic health conditions to explore their attitudes towards sharing their personal health data for research. Conducted in Western Australia, the sessions were adapted to online and face-to-face settings due to COVID-19 restrictions. Discussions were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a reflexive thematic approach to capture the diverse perspectives and experiences of the participants. The study revealed critical insights into how consumers with lived health experiences perceive the sharing of their health data for research. Key themes identified included data management and privacy concerns, the importance of transparent and patient-centric data governance models, and the varying levels of consumer trust in healthcare data-sharing processes. This research provides valuable contributions towards developing a more inclusive and effective framework for health data sharing in research. By understanding the unique perspectives of consumers with lived health experiences, the study provides an understanding of enhancing consumer trust and participation in data-sharing initiatives. These insights are crucial for improving the quality and relevance of healthcare delivery, research, and policy-making, ultimately benefiting the broader healthcare sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.