ReviewCureus2024
Diagnostic Challenges and Insights Into Granulomatous Mastitis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Granulomatous inflammation in histopathological samples: examining the aetiological spectrum, diagnostic challenges, and future perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis in a Nulliparous Woman With Autism Spectrum Disorder Receiving Long-Term Psychotropic Treatment and Normal Serum Prolactin Level: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- A Pictorial Review on Mastitis: Clinical Aspects, Imaging Features and Complications.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Characterization of Novel MRI Findings in Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Diagnostic Significance and Clinical Perspectives.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for differentiating granulomatous lobular mastitis from ductal carcinoma in situ.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a chronic inflammatory breast condition that presents significant diagnostic challenges due to its clinical and imaging similarities to malignancies. Accurate diagnosis is crucial to avoid unnecessary interventions and ensure effective management. A total of 1,216 articles were initially identified through a comprehensive database search. After removing duplicates and conducting a systematic review, 73 studies were shortlisted for full-text evaluation, with 31 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. These studies were analyzed to extract data on diagnostic methodologies, sample sizes, accuracy, and limitations. The review highlights the central role of histopathology in the definitive diagnosis of GM, supported by adjunctive tools such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and polymerase chain reaction. Imaging modalities, while valuable, often lack specificity and require histological confirmation. Emerging techniques, including quantitative imaging parameters and molecular diagnostics, offer promise in enhancing diagnostic precision. A multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical, radiological, and histopathological findings remains critical. GM diagnosis requires a nuanced approach combining traditional and emerging techniques. Histopathology remains the gold standard, but advancements in imaging and molecular diagnostics provide new avenues for improving accuracy and guiding management. The findings emphasize the need for further research and standardized diagnostic protocols to address the complexities of GM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.