ArticleCureus2024
Unveiling a Large Pelvic Mass in a Middle-Aged Woman: The Consequences of Neglected Gynecological Care.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic masses in women can originate from both gynecological and non-gynecological sources, necessitating careful evaluation to ensure appropriate treatment. Gynecological masses can range from functional ovarian cysts and tubo-ovarian abscesses to malignant and benign tumors. This case report presents a mucinous borderline ovarian tumor (BOT), a rare type of ovarian neoplasm. This case highlights a 48-year-old G6P6006 White female with a history of asthma, presenting to the emergency department with a 10-day history of constipation and a month-long history of abdominal distention, which caused shortness of breath when supine. The patient had no recent primary care or gynecological follow-up. Physical examination revealed abdominal distension with absent bowel sounds and multiple hemangiomas, but no peritoneal signs. Initial laboratory studies were within normal limits, except for an elevated cancer antigen 19.9 (CA 19.9) level of 736.5. Imaging studies, including ultrasound and CT, identified a large complex adnexal mass measuring 28 x 21.5 x 15.4 cm. Given the suspicion of a gynecologic malignancy, the patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral oophorosalpingectomy and an appendectomy. The mass, which was completely excised, was identified as a mucinous BOT measuring 32 cm at its largest diameter. Intraoperative pathology and peritoneal washings were negative for malignancy. Postoperatively, the patient met all recovery milestones and was discharged on day three, with a successful follow-up for staple removal. This case emphasizes the importance of timely access to healthcare in managing large ovarian tumors and potentially preventing malignant transformation. Improved access to healthcare services, particularly through insurance coverage, can enhance early detection and allow for comprehensive cancer care, thus improving survival outcomes. The case also highlights the lack of routine screening for many gynecological tumors, underscoring the need for improved healthcare access and awareness, which could facilitate earlier intervention and better patient outcomes. Early diagnosis and management of mucinous BOTs can significantly improve prognosis. Addressing healthcare access barriers remains crucial in reducing the risk of late-stage presentations and ensuring effective treatment for women with gynecological malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.