Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816311›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Surgical Operative Notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital.

Alnazeer Y Abdelbagi, Abubakr Muhammed, Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin Elnour, Mustafa Mohamed, Amir Alamin Ahmed Altyeb, Alaa Osman Sir Alkhatim Ali, Mohamed Khalid Hassan Abdelkarim, Fatima Aladdin Elssayed Osman, Elbokhari Mohamed Elbashir Hassan, Mahmoud Ali Mohamed Abdalrahman and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alnazeer Y AbdelbagiAnatomy, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, SDN.
Abubakr MuhammedSurgery, University of Gezira, Madani, SDN.
Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin ElnourGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Mustafa MohamedInternal Medicine, AL-Neelain University, Khartoum, SDN.
Amir Alamin Ahmed AltyebGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Alaa Osman Sir Alkhatim AliGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Mohamed Khalid Hassan AbdelkarimGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Fatima Aladdin Elssayed OsmanGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Elbokhari Mohamed Elbashir HassanGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Mahmoud Ali Mohamed AbdalrahmanGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Galaleldin Mohamed Abdeljalil MohamedGeneral Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Etigad Salahuddin Elzubier SulimanGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Khalid Ahmed Noureldaim AhmedGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.
Awad Abdalla Widaa MohamedGeneral Surgery, Port Sudan Teaching Hospital, Port Sudan, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Thorough and standardized documentation of operative notes is essential for effective communication, patient safety, legal protection, and the continuity of care. However, in many hospitals in Sudan, surgeons often use non-standardized methods, resulting in inconsistent and incomplete records. This study evaluates the quality of operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital using the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines, aiming to improve compliance and documentation practices. Methods A clinical audit was conducted in two cycles at the General Surgery Department. The first cycle, a retrospective review of 50 surgical notes, was carried out over one week in July 2024. The second cycle conducted prospectively on another 50 notes throughout September 2024, involved the implementation of an improved proforma and staff training. Data were collected using a standardized checklist aligned with Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) guidelines, covering 18 documentation criteria. Results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) to assess improvements in compliance. Results The compliance with documentation standards increased significantly from 51.9% in the first cycle to 82.1% in the second cycle. Notable improvements were observed in recording operative findings (17, 34%), complications (34, 68%), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (47, 94%). Despite the overall progress, modest improvements were noted in documenting the anesthetist's name (2.5, 5%) and the surgeon's signature (3, 6%). These findings underscore the positive impact of structured proformas and targeted staff training. Conclusion The implementation of standardized documentation tools and staff training significantly improved the quality of surgical operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital. While notable progress was achieved, continued efforts, including digital solutions and regular audits, are needed to sustain these improvements and promote patient safety.

Indexed as

audit cyclegeneral surgeryoperative notesquality improvementroyal college of surgeons

Identifiers

PMID39816311
PMCPMC11734865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.