ReviewCureus2024
Comparison of Current Techniques for Securing the Cystic Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Clip migration induced recurrent choledocholithiasis after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a widely performed procedure, with securing the cystic duct being a critical step to prevent bile leakage. Traditional metal clips are commonly used, but alternative methods, such as non-absorbable polymer clips, absorbable clips, sutures, and ultrasonic shears, are also utilized. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of various cystic duct securing techniques. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases without date restrictions. Eligible studies compared different techniques for cystic duct closure in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, focusing on bile leakage as a primary outcome. Data extraction and synthesis were performed using a binary random-effects model. Meta-analyses were conducted for absorbable clips, sutures, hem-o-lok clips, and ultrasonic devices compared to standard metal clips. A total of 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Absorbable polymer clips demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in postoperative bile leakage compared to metal clips (OR 0.159; 95% CI 0.031-0.818; P=0.028). In contrast, no significant differences were observed when comparing metal clips with suture ties (OR 0.459, 95% CI 0.139-1.522,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.