Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816275›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Prospective Study of a Custom-Made Eco-Friendly Thyroid Shield: A Breakthrough in Radiation Protection.

Mulagolla Sirisha, Bharani Krishna Takkella, Jyothyrmayi Ambadipudi, Nakoor Akshath Rai, Rohit Vadlamani, Vallurupalli Jayanth, Kasireddy Naga Tejaswi, Chukka Ram Sunil, Sujanamulk Bhavana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mulagolla SirishaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) Dental College, Amalapuram, IND.
Bharani Krishna TakkellaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
Jyothyrmayi AmbadipudiDepartment of General Dentistry, Fresh Dental Smiles, Lauderhill, USA.
Nakoor Akshath RaiDepartment of General Dentistry, Jefferson Dental and Orthodontics, Dallas, USA.
Rohit VadlamaniSchool of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Vallurupalli JayanthDepartment of Medicine, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
Kasireddy Naga TejaswiDepartment of Medicine, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.
Chukka Ram SunilDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Guntur, IND.
Sujanamulk BhavanaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Drs Sudha and Nageswara Rao Siddhartha Institute of Dental Sciences, Vijayawada, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The thyroid gland is the most susceptible organ to radiation during the exposure of teeth because the thyroid area appears to be within the primary beam, and the dose levels are relatively high even after using collimation. This study aims to develop an eco-friendly thyroid shield by reusing lead foils from intra-oral periapical radiographic films and evaluate its effectiveness in intraoral radiography. Methods A total of 16 patients undergoing endodontic procedures who gave written consent to participate in the study were included and divided into four categories: anterior, canine, premolar, and molar. After preparing a thyroid shield by reutilizing the lead foils, its effectiveness was checked and compared with that of a commercially available thyroid collar (CTC) by measuring the equivalent dose at the position of the thyroid gland while taking radiographs for all four categories. Instruments used included lead foils, cardboard, a CTC, a custom-made thyroid shield (CTS), a dosimeter, and X-ray film. Later, they were divided into three groups: Group I (without), Group II (with CTC), and Group III (with CTS). Results During the radiography, the CTS (Group III) reduced the radiation dose at the thyroid level by approximately 89% and was more effective than the CTC (Group II) in dose reduction when size 2 intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiographs were used. Conclusion The results of this study concluded that the CTS, besides its low cost and ease of preparation, is eco-friendly and more effective than the CTC in terms of dose reduction.

Indexed as

commercially available thyroid collarcustom made thyroid shielddosimeterequivalent doseintra-oral radiographyradiation exposuresv(sievert)

Identifiers

PMID39816275
PMCPMC11732960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.