ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2025
Adverse Drug Reactions in Pregnant People with Hypertension and/or Diabetes: Temporal Profile and Associated Factors.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnant people, especially those with diabetes mellitus or hypertension, are particularly vulnerable to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Objective: To determine the incidence of and factors associated with ADRs in hospitalized pregnant people with diabetes and/or hypertension. Methods: This prospective cohort study involved pregnant people with diabetes and/or hypertension admitted to a maternity hospital in Natal, Brazil, between August 2019 and July 2022. Data for various patient characteristics and the occurrence of ADRs were collected by means of interviewing patients and searching their medical charts. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify and analyze the association of ADRs with various patient characteristics and other factors. Results: A total of 571 pregnant people met the inclusion criteria. Over the study period, the incidence rate of ADRs was 634.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 522.7-787.1) per 1000 patient-days, with 123 (21.5%) of the patients experiencing at least 1 incident. ADRs occurred predominately in the first 24 hours, with a marked decrease in frequency to the seventh day of admission. Methyldopa was identified as the cause in 42.1% (8/19) of cases of headache and 39.5% (17/43) of cases of sedation. Systemic corticosteroids were responsible for almost all cases of hyperglycemia (97.0% [32/33]). Blurred vision (82.4% [14/17]) and sedation (14.0% [6/43]) were related to the administration of antiemetics and antinauseants, especially scopolamine. Longer hospitalization time (OR 1.052, 95% CI 1.010-1.097, Conclusions: In this study, 1 of every 5 hospitalized pregnant people had at least 1 ADR, most often in the first 24 hours, with a decrease in incidence in the following days. Pregnant people with longer hospital stays and a greater number of medications had a higher risk of ADRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.