ArticleNarra J2024
Comparison of total and partial parenteral nutrition to achieve calorie target among treated children in the intensive care unit.
Article in Narra J, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The achievement of recommended calorie targets for parenteral nutrition in pediatric patients receiving treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Indonesia remains suboptimal, necessitating cautious implementation of this nutritional intervention alone. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and partial parenteral nutrition (PPN) in achieving the calorie requirements of pediatric patients receiving treatments in the PICU. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the PICU at H. Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia, among patients aged between 28 days to 18 years. The consecutive sampling method was employed to collect samples based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The assessments of recommended calorie achievement targets were conducted up to 240 hours after initial nutrition treatment. Other possible factors associated with the achievement of the nutrition target were also assessed between groups, such as demographic data, length of treatment, nutritional status, and underlying diseases. A total of 30 patients were included in each group (TPN and PPN). There were no significant differences in age, weight, height, sex, or underlying diseases between groups. All patients in both groups achieved the target calorie requirements after 168 hours. Our data indicated that the percentage of patients who met the target calorie requirements was significantly different at initial treatment, 72 hours, and 120 hours post-treatment between groups (all had
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.