Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816106›Full record

ArticleNarra J2024

Impacts of COVID-19 on malaria elimination strategies in Asia: A scoping review.

Risalia R Arisanti, Grace Nd Saputri, Riris A Ahmad, Adi Utarini

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Narra J, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Risalia R ArisantiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Grace Nd SaputriDepartment of Nutrition, STIKes Panti Rapih, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Riris A AhmadDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Adi UtariniCenter of Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global malaria program has faced setbacks due to disruptions in health services caused by COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these challenges, Asia that primarily comprised of low and middle-income countries (LMICs), continues to make strides towards malaria elimination. This scoping review explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on malaria control programs in Asian countries with varying levels of malaria endemicity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was applied to search for articles published between January 2020 and May 2024 that examined the impact of COVID-19 on malaria control programs in Asia on six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, WHO COVID-19 Research Database, Garuda and Sinta). The findings of these articles were organized into five themes: epidemiology and surveillance, case management (including diagnosis and coinfection), vector control, prevention, and program management. Overall, 54 articles from countries with various endemicity levels were included. These studies focused on malaria epidemiology, surveillance, and case management, with few studies on vector control. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected malaria control differently in different regions. In malaria-free, low-, and high-endemic countries, malaria cases were reduced mainly due to strict public health measures such as travel restrictions, quarantines, and COVID-19-related stigma, which reduced clinic attendance. Conversely, increased malaria cases owing to increased imports, relapses of malaria cases triggered by COVID-19, social conflicts, and underreporting have contributed to this surge. The priority shift to COVID-19 has affected malaria centers, resulting in personnel shortages, budget limits, and an increased number of malaria cases and outbreaks. The pandemic has also spurred innovative malaria prevention methods, such as using social media to raise awareness in China. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a mixed impact on the number of malarial cases reported across Asia. The three main factors were travel restrictions, COVID-19-related stigma, and shifting priorities to COVID-19. Integrating malaria control and COVID-19 strategies, strengthening the healthcare system, developing flexible malaria control strategies during crises, and developing innovative solutions could mitigate these impacts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Disease EradicationMalariaAsiaHumansSARS-CoV-2AsiaCOVID-19impactsMalaria eliminationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID39816106
PMCPMC11731659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.