ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Later lines of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: real-world data from a setting with barriers to access cancer therapies.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker testing, treatment patterns and outcomes in previously treated pMMR or non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Development of a prognostic risk model for colorectal cancer and association of the prognostic model with cancer stem cell and immune cell infiltration.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFD/TPI) are oral systemic therapies with survival benefit in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, but they are not widely available worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with limited access to these drugs. Methods: Retrospective study involving 510 patients with mCRC who were treated at five different centers in Brazil, from January 2011 to December 2019. We analyzed the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who were exposed to third-line and beyond systemic therapy (N=148). Results: A total of 148 (29%) and 73 (14%) patients received third- and fourth-line therapies, respectively. Most patients had left-sided tumors (80%) and had undergone primary tumor resection (87%) and metastasectomy (62%). From the initiation of third-line therapy, median follow-up was 17.8 months and median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% confidence interval: 8.1-18.0) (58% of deaths). The most adopted therapies were reexposure to previous chemotherapy regimens (85% third-line and 71% fourth-line), followed by regorafenib (13% and 25%) and TFD/TPI (2% and 4%). In multivariable analysis, male patients and right-sided tumors were significant unfavorable prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: In a real-world setting with barriers to accessing the standard of care of chemorefractory mCRC, reexposure to chemotherapy was the main therapeutic strategy, with potential negative influence on OS. Our study highlights how barriers hamper the achievement of health equity in cancer care and increases the awareness of patients and stakeholders, contributing to engaging them in ensuring equitable access to high-quality cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.