ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2024
Regional trends in colorectal cancer mortality in people aged 45-84 years in the US, 1999-2022.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal trends, demographic disparities, and predictions to 2040 in gastrointestinal cancer mortality in the United States.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Regional, demographic and temporal trends in anemia and malignant cancer-related mortality in U.S. older adults: a nationwide CDC WONDER analysis (1999-2020).Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- U.S. Colorectal Cancer Mortality, 1999-2023: A 25-Year National Analysis of Trends and Disparities.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Development of a prognostic risk model for colorectal cancer and association of the prognostic model with cancer stem cell and immune cell infiltration.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Insights on colorectal cancer mortality trends between 1999-2022 in the US: the importance of place and sex.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening via colonoscopy is now advised for most adults beginning at age 45 years, an update from the earlier recommendation of age 50 years. With the increase in CRC screening rates, it is crucial to examine how mortality rates have changed over time. The aim of this study is to identify trends and regional differences in CRC mortality over the last two decades, specifically in individuals within the CRC recommended screening age group. Methods: This study used the Center for Disease Control's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) system to collect data on CRC mortality for people ages 45-84 years in the United States from 1999-2022. Results: During the study period, the overall age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) for CRC decreased across all census regions. The Midwest consistently had the highest AAMR, while the West had the lowest. Among genders, males in the Northeast had the highest rates, whereas females in the West had the lowest. Black or African Americans in the Midwest experienced the highest AAMR among racial groups, while Asian or Pacific Islanders in the Midwest had the lowest AAMR. Conclusions: The mortality rate of CRC has been decreasing since 1999, but differences between regional groups have persisted. Disparities in outcomes still exist, showing that vulnerable subgroups require targeted interventions such as improved screening and follow-up access to increase early-stage diagnoses and potential for curative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.