Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815850›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Clinical SANTI classification of arthrogenic muscle inhibition has an excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in preoperative and post-operative anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Alexandre Le Guen, Emilie Bérard, Hasnae Ben-Roummane, Kévin Lacaze, Thomas Richaud, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Etienne Cavaignac

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition: A prevalent issue in knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandre Le GuenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4249-5329
Emilie BérardDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, CERPOP, INSERM-University of Toulouse III, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU), Toulouse, France.
Hasnae Ben-RoummaneUnité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche (USMR), Service d'Epidémiologie Clinique et de Santé Publique, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Kévin LacazeSport Pro Santé, Toulouse, France.
Thomas RichaudClinique Médipôle Garonne, Toulouse, France.
Bertrand Sonnery-CottetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-0425
Etienne CavaignacDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-7567

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is a reflexive shutdown of the quadriceps muscles following a knee injury or surgery that presents with or without hamstring contracture. This complication can be classified according to the SANTI classification, but the reproducibility of this clinical classification has not yet been demonstrated.

methodsThis single-centre longitudinal observational study included 140 patients who were within 6 weeks of an ACL rupture. The presence of AMI was assessed separately and blindly during the preoperative consultation and at 3 weeks post-operative by an Orthopaedic Surgeon, an Orthopaedic Resident, a Sports Medicine Physician and a Physiotherapist. AMI was also assessed a second time by the physiotherapist, 10 days after the first assessment, before and after reconstruction surgery, in order to measure intra-rater reliability. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the AMI classification was determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsAgreement for the AMI classification between different examiners was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.99 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.99-0.99]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.98-0.99]). Agreement in the AMI classification, when determined repeatedly by the same assessor (physiotherapist), was excellent pre-operatively (ICC = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.94]) and post-operatively (ICC = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.99]).

conclusionExcellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the AMI classification system was found in patients with recent ACL rupture and post-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study prospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionPostoperative ComplicationsQuadriceps MuscleAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPreoperative PeriodReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultanterior cruciate ligament reconstructionarthrogenic muscle inhibitionrehabilitationsport surgery

Identifiers

PMID39815850
PMCPMC12205408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.