Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815691›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Engaging With a Community of Practice in Dementia: Impacts on Skills, Knowledge, Networks and Accessing Support.

Clarissa Giebel, James Watson, Megan Polden, Megan Readman, Hilary Tetlow, Mark Gabbay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-Design of a Community of Practice for People With Personal and Professional Expertise or Interest in Dementia in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566
James WatsonDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-1906
Megan PoldenDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Megan ReadmanDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Hilary TetlowSURF Liverpool, UK.
Mark GabbayDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo deliver implementable, meaningful research and advance knowledge, different stakeholders need to be brought together regularly via a suitable platform or community of practice. The Liverpool Dementia & Ageing Research Forum, set up in 2019, is a public/professional community of practice, providing in-person and remote events and activities to connect people living with dementia, unpaid carers, health and social care professionals, Third Sector representatives and commissioners. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the experiences and impacts of engaging with Forum events by different stakeholders.

methodsAttendees of any Forum events were eligible to take part. We conducted remote semi-structured interviews about the experiences and impacts of engaging with the Forum between November 2023 and April 2024. Anonymised transcripts were coded by three research team members, including a trained public advisor (unpaid carer), using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsSeventeen attendees participated in the study. These included people living with dementia, unpaid carers, Third Sector representatives, academics and health and social care providers. Four overarching themes were identified in the data: facilitated networking within and outside of personal expertise, improved knowledge and capacity, empowerment by having one's voice heard and diversity in stakeholders but not the background. The Forum events were utilised on a drop- in and -out basis for most attendees, often picking events that were of immediate interest to them, whilst some attended almost all events. Engaging with the Forum was found to strongly facilitate increased networking and building relationships, especially outside of stakeholder background, whilst diversity in backgrounds of attendees, such as ethnic diversity, was lacking.

conclusionsThis Community of Practice has successfully brought together diverse stakeholders to network and expand their relationships, and increased knowledge and capacity in different stakeholder groups. Whilst the Forum was considered inclusive, future outreach work needs to ensure that greater diversity in backgrounds and personal experiences is reflected in attendees, and that a continuous flow of new attendees joins. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: One unpaid carer was involved as a public advisor and was supported in coding two anonymised transcripts and interpreting the findings. They also helped codesign the semi-structured topic guide.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaCommunity of PracticeFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSocial Supportcommunity of practicedementiapublic engagement

Identifiers

PMID39815691
PMCPMC11735733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.