ArticleBMC global and public health2025
Optimal allocation of antenatal and young child nutrition interventions: an individual-based global burden of disease calibrated microsimulation.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A Scoping Review of the Literature on Child and/or Adolescent Health Microsimulation Models.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUndernutrition remains a global crisis and is a focus of Sustainable Development Goals. While there are multiple known, effective interventions, complex interactions between prevention and treatment and resource constraints can lead to difficulties in allocating funding. Simulation studies that use in silico simulation can help illuminate the interactions between interventions and provide insight into the cost-effectiveness of alternative packages of options.
methodsWe developed an individual-based microsimulation model based on the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study data to test a range of nutrition interventions, including antenatal interventions (iron and folic acid, multiple micronutrients, and balanced energy protein supplementation) and child interventions (treatment for severe acute malnutrition, treatment for moderate acute malnutrition, and wasting prevention with small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements). We also developed an analytic approach to process the results of the microsimulation and identify the optimal intervention funding allocation for a given budget size. We use Ethiopia as an example in this paper.
resultsIn our illustrative example of Ethiopia, the reallocation of the baseline budget to minimize disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) resulted in first funding the antenatal multiple micronutrients to their maximum coverage and then funding treatment for severe child acute malnutrition. Relative to the baseline allocation, the reallocation optimized to minimizing DALYs resulted in 592,000 fewer annual DALYs, constituting an 8.3% reduction in total DALYs in Ethiopia. For budgets larger than the baseline, our model recommended funding first targeted moderate acute malnutrition treatment, second universal moderate acute malnutrition treatment, third wasting prevention with small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements, and fourth balanced energy protein supplementation.
conclusionsOur simulation is a novel model for estimating optimal allocation of spending on antenatal and child health nutrition interventions which accounts for the interaction between preventive and therapeutic approaches. Our illustrative results show that an optimized reallocation of current spending can substantially improve pregnancy-related and child health without additional funding. We hope this model can add validity and confidence to prior results to aid stakeholders in funding decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.