ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Evidence and perspectives on miRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a bibliometric study.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The highly expressed lncRNA TRG-AS1 in serum specifically inhibits miR-139-5p, thereby promoting oxidative stress and inflammation in heart failure.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Epigenetic regulation of cardiac physiology and pathophysiology: biological sex matters.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- Silent controllers: non-coding RNAs drive autophagic response in myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Tumor microenvironment: new era in exosomal circRNA research - a bibliometric analysis.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivemiRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA play crucial roles in the pathogenesis and progression of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MI/RI). This study aims to provide valuable insights into miRNA, circRNA, lncRNA, and MI/RI from a bibliometric standpoint, with the goal of fostering further advancements in this area.
methodsThe relevant literature in the field of miRNA, circRNA, lncRNA, and MI/RI was retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) database within Web of Science. The "Analyze Results" and "Citation Report" functions in WOS were utilized to compile the annual publication and citation counts in this field. Microsoft Office Excel 2019 was used to organize and visualize the data. Furthermore, bibliometric and visualization analyses of countries/regions, institutions, authors, keywords, and references were conducted using the bibliometric visualization software CiteSpace.
resultsA total of 858 publications were included for further analysis in this field. The literature was published across 297 journals, with Molecular Medicine Reports contributing the highest number of publications. Researchers from 45 countries participated in studies within this field, with those from China contributing the most publications. The research hotspots in this field primarily focus on three areas: the role of miRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA in the pathogenesis of MI/RI, their potential as therapeutic targets, and their role as biomarkers. Among these, circular RNA, therapy target, inflammatory response, and cardiomyocyte ferroptosis are likely to emerge as emerging trends in this field.
conclusionThe overall development of research in this field is on the rise. The compilation of research hotspots and emerging trends in this area may provide researchers with more references and assistance in selecting research directions, ultimately benefiting MI/RI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.