ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
The clinical value and most informative threshold of polygenic risk score in the Quebec City Case-Control Asthma Cohort.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-genome-wide association study variant-to-function challenges in asthma research.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- Genetic mechanisms of pollinosis: interactions between genes and environmental factors.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified genetic variants robustly associated with asthma. A potential near-term clinical application is to calculate polygenic risk score (PRS) to improve disease risk prediction. The value of PRS, as part of numerous multi-source variables used to define asthma, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate PRS and define most informative thresholds in relation to conventional clinical and physiological criteria of asthma using a multivariate statistical method. Clinical and genome-wide genotyping data were obtained from the Quebec City Case-Control Asthma Cohort (QCCCAC), which is an independent cohort from previous GWAS. PRS was derived using LDpred2 and integrated with other asthma phenotypes by means of Principal Component Analysis with Optimal Scaling (PCAOS). PRS was considered using 'ordinal level of scaling' to account for non-linear information. In two dimensional PCAOS space, the first component delineated individuals with and without asthma, whereas the severity of asthma was discerned on the second component. The positioning of high vs. low PRS in this space matched the presence and absence of airway hyperresponsiveness, showing that PRS delineated cases and controls at the same extent as a positive bronchial challenge test. The top 10% and the bottom 5% of the PRS were the most informative thresholds to define individuals at high and low genetic risk of asthma in this cohort. PRS used in a multivariate method offers a decision-making space similar to hyperresponsiveness in this cohort and highlights the most informative and asymmetrical thresholds to define high and low genetic risk of asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.