Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815255›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Assessment of MPOX infection-related knowledge levels, concerns, and associated factors: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Mehmet Emin Arayici, Suleyman Dolu, Hasan Ozdek Sayilir, Hatice Simsek, Sükran Kose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet Emin ArayiciDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, 15 July Medicine and Art Campus, Inciralti-Balcova 35340, İzmir, Türkiye. mehmet.e.arayici@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-5129
Suleyman DoluDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7496-9493
Hasan Ozdek SayilirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0002-4745-5232
Hatice SimsekDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7209-485X
Sükran KoseDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4228-1213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMPOX (Monkeypox) is a zoonotic disease of increasing global concern due to its re-emergence and potential for human-to-human transmission. Effective public health interventions rely on understanding socio-demographic determinants of knowledge and perceptions of the disease. This study aimed to investigate MPOX-related knowledge and concerns among a diverse sample in Türkiye, identifying key factors influencing knowledge levels.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 509 participants aged 18-73 years (mean age: 33.8 ± 15.6) in all settlements of Türkiye. Socio-demographic data were collected, and MPOX knowledge and concerns were assessed using a structured data form. To assess knowledge levels regarding MPOX, 15 questions were defined with 1 point given for each correct answer, and these questions were then categorized as high knowledge (≥ 10 correct answers) and low knowledge (< 10 correct answers). Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with knowledge levels. Trust and reliance on information sources were also evaluated. The data form was distributed to participants via social media platforms.

resultsThe majority of participants (97.1%) were aware of MPOX, but only 6.5% believed adequate precautions were in place. The mean knowledge score was 7.6 ± 3.7, with 37.7% demonstrating high knowledge. In terms of concerns about MPOX, only 31.6% of participants were identified as concerned, whereas the majority (68.4%) of the participants reported no significant concerns. The most trusted source of information about MPOX among the participants was medical doctors and healthcare professionals, as indicated by 53.63% of respondents. Low knowledge was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.015), female gender (p = 0.002), lower education levels (p < 0.001), non-medical fields (p < 0.001), and lower income (p < 0.001). Social media (53.11%) was the most common information source, yet healthcare professionals (53.63%) were the most trusted. Multivariable logistic regression confirmed that being in non-medical fields (OR = 2.858, 95% CI: 1.809-4.515, p < 0.001), lower income (OR = 3.141, 95% CI: 2.015-4.896, p < 0.001), and perceived low immunity (OR = 2.264, 95% CI: 1.350-3.797, p = 0.002) independently predicted lower knowledge.

conclusionsDespite high awareness, significant gaps in MPOX knowledge exist, particularly among older adults, females, non-medical professionals, and those with low income. Public health strategies should prioritize these groups, leveraging trusted sources like healthcare professionals while improving the reliability of digital information platforms.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultAdultsConcernKnowledge levelMonkeypox

Identifiers

PMID39815255
PMCPMC11737147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.