Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815253›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

Immune responses of cattle vaccinated by various routes with Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG).

Mitchell V Palmer, Soyoun Hwang, Carly Kanipe, Ellie J Putz, Luis Guilherme Virgilio Fernandes, Anna Didkowska, Paola M Boggiatto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mitchell V PalmerBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. mitchell.palmer@usda.gov.
Soyoun HwangCenter for Veterinary Biologics, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Carly KanipeBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Ellie J PutzBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Luis Guilherme Virgilio FernandesOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 1299 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, USA.
Anna DidkowskaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, Warsaw, 02-776, Poland.
Paola M BoggiattoBacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, 1920 Dayton Ave, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycobacterium bovis BCG is the human tuberculosis vaccine and is the oldest vaccine still in use today with over 4 billion people vaccinated since 1921. The BCG vaccine has also been investigated experimentally in cattle and wildlife by various routes including oral and parenteral. Thus far, oral vaccination studies of cattle have involved liquid BCG or liquid BCG incorporated into a lipid matrix. Lyophilization is an established technique used for stabilizing bioproducts such as vaccines.

methodsIn the current study, cattle were vaccinated in two phases. In each phase, cattle were divided into three groups. Group 1 received BCG injected SQ, Group 2 received liquid BCG delivered to the posterior oral cavity, Group 3 orally consumed lyophilized BCG contained within a gelatin capsule placed within a small amount of a commercial alfalfa product.

resultsNo vaccinated cattle were positive by an interferon gamma release assay. All but 4 animals were negative by tuberculin skin testing prior to vaccination: the 4 non-negative animals being categorized as suspects. Sixteen weeks post-vaccination all but 1 animal was negative, it being categorized as a suspect. An in vitro antigen stimulation assay and flow cytometry were used to detect antigen-specific CD4, CD8 and γδ T cell responses following vaccination. Oral vaccination of animals with lyophilized BCG did not result in any increases in the frequency of CD4, CD8 or γδ T cell proliferative or IFN-γ responses at any of the time points analyzed in either phase 1 or 2. In contrast, vaccination with BCG SQ and liquid BCG delivered to the posterior pharynx, resulted in an increase in the frequency of proliferating and IFN-γ-producing CD4 T cells with peak responses at 9-12 weeks post-vaccination. Similar to oral lyophilized BCG vaccinated animals, we did not observe any significant increases in the frequency of CD8 and γδ T cell proliferative and IFN-γ responses following SQ or oral liquid vaccinated animals.

conclusionsThese data would suggest that vaccination with oral lyophilized BCG does not induce a measurable, antigen-specific cell mediated responses in the periphery, when compared to BCG administered SQ or liquid BCG administered via the oral route. However, vaccination with either SQ or liquid BCG delivered to the posterior pharynx does induce measurable CD4 T cell responses in the periphery.

Indexed as

BCG VaccineMycobacterium bovisTuberculosis, BovineVaccinationAdministration, OralAnimalsCattleFemaleBCG VaccineBCGBovineLyophilizationMycobacteriaOralTuberculosisVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39815253
PMCPMC11734464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.