ArticleBMC public health2025
Prediction and unsupervised clustering of fertility intention among migrant workers based on machine learning: a cross-sectional survey from Henan, China.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a machine learning-driven framework for differentiating pediatric bronchopneumonia from lobar pneumonia: a multicenter investigation.European journal of medical research · 2025Trial
- Development of machine learning-based predictive models for fertility intentions in patients with Crohn's disease.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Preoperative risk stratification for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps using explainable machine learning: implications for screening optimization and resource allocation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal evolution of online interest in assisted reproductive technology: a two-decade global analysis through google trends.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough China has implemented multiple policies to encourage childbirth, the results have been underwhelming. Migrant workers account for a considerable proportion of China's population, most of whom are of childbearing age. However, few articles focus on their fertility intentions.
methodFrom August 3 to August 29, 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in Henan Province, China, which included 18,806 participants. Machine learning was used to construct a predictive model for the fertility intention of migrant workers, and unsupervised clustering was used to explore subgroup classification.
resultOut of 18,806 participants, only 1057 had fertility intention. We constructed a predictive model for fertility intention based on XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.83. Age, number of children, and marital status are the most important characteristics that affect the fertility intention of migrant workers. Subsequently, unsupervised clustering was conducted on participants without fertility intentions, and it was found that they could be divided into three categories of population. The first group of people is the youngest and mostly unmarried without pregnancy, the second group has the lowest monthly income and self-perceived economic level, and the third group is the oldest and has the highest proportion of women. Regardless of the group, economic and age factors are the main reasons for participants not having a family plan in the near future.
conclusionThe fertility intention of the migrant workers is at an extremely low level. Improving childcare-related benefits and family support services to reduce the economic and time costs of childcare is an effective measure to reverse fertility intentions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.