Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815210›Full record

Observational studyBMC neurology2025

Delirium at the intensive care unit and long-term survival: a retrospective study.

Ignazio De Trizio, Maria Angeliki Komninou, Jutta Ernst, Reto Schüpbach, Jan Bartussek, Giovanna Brandi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Delirium modifies the prognostic performance of SAPS-II.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Let us drive light out!Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ignazio De Trizio *Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Maria Angeliki Komninou *Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jutta ErnstCentre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto SchüpbachInstitute for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jan Bartussek *Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Giovanna Brandi *Institute for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. giovanna.brandi@uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a common complication in patients at the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with prolonged ICU-stay and hospitalization and with increased morbidity. The impact of ICU-delirium on long-term survival is not clearly understood.

methodsThis retrospective single center observational study was conducted at the Institute of Intensive Care Medicine at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. All adult ICU-survivors over a four-year period were screened for eligibility. ICU-delirium was defined based on the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC), together with the coded diagnosis F05 in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-2019). ICU-survivors who developed delirium during their ICU stay (group D) were compared with ICU-survivors who did not (group ND). Survival was evaluated according to data from hospital electronic health records up to four years from ICU-discharge. The survival analysis was reported using Kaplan-Meier curves and absolute risk differences (ARD). A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted with long-term survival at four years after ICU-discharge as outcome of interest, including several clinical conditions and interventions associated with long-term survival for ICU patients. For subgroup analysis, ICU-survivors were grouped based on age at the time of admission (45-54, 55-64, ≥ 65 years), and on relevant clinical conditions.

resultsA total of 9'604 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of them 22.6% (n = 2'171) developed ICU-delirium. Overall, patients in the group D had a significantly lower probability of survival than patients in the group ND (p < 0.0001, ARD = 11.8%). In the multivariable analysis, ICU-delirium was confirmed as independently associated with long-term survival. After grouping for age categories, patients between 55 and 64 years of age in the group D were less likely to survive than patients in the group ND at every time point analyzed, up to four years after ICU discharge (p < 0.001, ARD = 7.3%). This difference was even more significant in the comparison between patients over 65 years (p < 0.0001, ARD 11.1%). No significant difference was observed in the other age groups.

conclusionsIn the study population, ICU-delirium was independently associated with a reduced long-term survival. Patients who developed ICU-delirium had a reduced survival up to four years after ICU discharge and this association was particularly evident in patients above 55 years of age.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care UnitsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandDeliriumEncephalopathyICULong-term survival

Identifiers

PMID39815210
PMCPMC11734231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.