Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815188›Full record

ReviewBMC cancer2025

A conceptual model for advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a review of qualitative studies and results from patient interviews.

France Ginchereau Sowell, Thom de Milliano, Keri J S Brady, Ginamarie Foglia, Medha Sasane, Samira Bensfia, Matthew Reaney

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

France Ginchereau SowellPatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, New York, NY, USA. france.ginchereau@iqvia.com.
Thom de MillianoConsulting Services, IQVIA, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Keri J S BradySanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ginamarie FogliaSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Medha SasaneSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Samira BensfiaSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Matthew ReaneyPatient Centered Solutions, IQVIA, Reading, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite approvals of new first-line immunotherapies for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (aGC/GEJC), patients' median survival is around 14 months and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is affected by disease-related symptoms and treatment-related side effects. Using a targeted literature review (TLR) and patient interviews, this study identified disease- and treatment-related concepts that are important to patients with aGC/GEJC and their HRQoL.

methodsA TLR was conducted to identify primary qualitative studies from 2018 to 2021 on patients' experiences with aGC/GEJC. The results, supplemented with the results of two previously identified studies from 2017, were used to develop a preliminary conceptual disease model of aGC/GEJC and an interview guide. Next, one-to-one concept elicitation interviews were conducted where patients with aGC/GEJC were asked about symptoms, impacts on daily life, experience of care, treatment expectations, and clinical trials. The conceptual model was refined using these patient experience data.

resultsFour studies selected from the TLR and the two previously summarized studies identified 47 symptoms (15 disease-related, 20 treatment-related, 12 disease- and treatment-related) and 35 impacts. Interviews with 20 patients identified 36 symptoms. The 12 most important symptoms (mentioned by ≥ 50% of patients; average disturbance ratings: ≥5, scale: 0 'not disturbing' to 10 'extremely disturbing') were: nausea, fatigue, temperature sensitivity, indigestion, weakness, diarrhea, vomiting, early satiety, swallowing difficulties, taste alterations, abdominal pain, general pain. Symptoms were mostly attributed to systemic treatments (chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapy), followed by surgery. Thirty-one impacts emerged from the interviews, the most common being emotional disturbances, impacts on daily activities and families, and requiring assistance from caregivers. Patients were mostly positive about their experience of care, willing to enroll in clinical trials, and keen to receive innovative treatments with few side effects. The final conceptual disease model details the symptoms and impacts of aGC/GEJC.

conclusionsThe conceptual model provides valuable data on signs/symptoms and impacts of aGC/GEJC affecting patients' lives. This can guide the clinical outcome assessment strategy for the development of innovative treatments more comprehensively than input from physicians alone, to ensure treatments improve both patients' survival and HRQoL. Interviews also help understand patients' perspectives on clinical trials.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchAdvanced/metastatic gastric cancer/Gastroesophageal junction cancerConceptual modelGastric cancerGastroesophageal junction cancerHealth-related quality of lifePatient experience dataPatient interviewsPatient-reported outcomesQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39815188
PMCPMC11734369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.