Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815182›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Molecular phylogeny and comparative chloroplast genome analysis of the type species Crucigenia quadrata.

Ting Wang, Huan Feng, Huan Zhu, Bojian Zhong

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plastid genome variation in the green algal genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ting WangCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Huan FengCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China.
Huan ZhuInstitute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Bojian ZhongCollege of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, 210023, China. bjzhong@gmail.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32122010 and 32370228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe confused taxonomic classification of Crucigenia is mainly inferred through morphological evidence and few nuclear genes and chloroplast genomic fragments. The phylogenetic status of C. quadrata, as the type species of Crucigenia, remains considerably controversial. Additionally, there are currently no reports on the chloroplast genome of Crucigenia.

resultsIn this study, we utilize molecular phylogenetics and comparative genomics to show that C. quadrata belongs to Chlorophyceae rather than Trebouxiophyceae. The Bayesian and maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees support a monophyletic group of C. quadrata and Scenedesmaceae (Chlorophyceae) species. Our study presents the first complete chloroplast genome of C. quadrata, which is 197,184 bp in length and has a GC content of 31%. It has a typical quadripartite structure, and the chloroplast genome codons exhibit usage bias. Nucleotide diversity analysis highlights six genes (ccsA, psbF, chlN, cemA, rps3, rps18) as hotspots for genetic variation. Coding gene sequence divergence analyses indicate that four genes (cemA, clpP, psaA, rps3) are subject to positive selection.

conclusionsThe determination of the phylogenetic status and the comparative chloroplast genomic analyses of C. quadrata will not only be useful in enhancing our understanding of the intricacy of Crucigenia taxonomy but also provide the important basis for studying the evolution of the incertae sedis taxa within Trebouxiophyceae.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastPhylogenyBase CompositionGenes, PlantGenetic VariationComparative genomicsCrucigenia quadrataPhylogenetic analysesPlastid genome

Identifiers

PMID39815182
PMCPMC11737255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.