ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2025
Multistage deep learning for classification of Helicobacter pylori infection status using endoscopic images.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-region and multi-image convolutional neural network model for detecting gastric helicobacter pylori infection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Clarifying diagnostic scope and future perspectives in AI-assisted diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- AI-powered three-categoryFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe automated classification of Helicobacter pylori infection status is gaining attention, distinguishing among uninfected (no history of H. pylori infection), current infection, and post-eradication. However, this classification has relatively low performance, primarily due to the intricate nature of the task. This study aims to develop a new multistage deep learning method for automatically classifying H. pylori infection status.
methodsThe proposed multistage deep learning method was developed using a training set of 538 subjects, then tested on a validation set of 146 subjects. The classification performance of this new method was compared with the findings of four physicians.
resultsThe accuracy of our method was 87.7%, 83.6%, and 95.9% for uninfected, post-eradication, and currently infected cases, respectively, whereas that of the physicians was 81.7%, 76.5%, and 90.3%, respectively. When including the patient's H. pylori eradication history information, the classification accuracy of the method was 92.5%, 91.1%, and 98.6% for uninfected, post-eradication, and currently infected cases, respectively, whereas that of the physicians was 85.6%, 85.1%, and 97.4%, respectively.
conclusionThe new multistage deep learning method shows potential for an innovative approach to gastric cancer screening. It can evaluate individual subjects' cancer risk based on endoscopic images and reduce the burden of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39815116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.