Observational studyNeurocritical care2025
The Role of Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Prediction of Sepsis-Associated Encephalopathy: Prospective Observational Study.
Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Ultrasonographic Assessment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Prediction of Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy
Correlation Between Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measured by Ultrasound and Delirium in Cardiac Surgery
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic models for sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation in the intensive care unit: narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Prognostic Value of Ultrasonographic Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Patients with Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a satisfactory noninvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring test. Our aim was to evaluate ONSD as an objective screening tool to predict and diagnose ICP changes early in sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE).
methodsOur prospective observational study was conducted on patients with sepsis, and after intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the time to diagnose SAE was recorded, and patients were divided into a non-SAE group including conscious patients with sepsis and a SAE group including patients with sepsis with acute onset of disturbed conscious level. ONSD was measured within 24 h of ICU admission for all patients and then every other day for up to 10 consecutive days until ICU discharge or death. The primary outcome was to compare ONSD measurements of both groups to find if there was a correlation between ONSD and SAE occurrence.
resultsEighty-nine patients with sepsis were divided into a non-SAE group (n = 45) and an SAE group (n = 44). ONSD showed a statistically significant difference at day 0 and a highly significant difference at days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10. Day 2 ONSD had the best accuracy for predicting SAE, with a cutoff > 5.2 mm (sensitivity of 93.2%, specificity of 100%), a statistically positive correlation with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (r = 0.485, P < 0.001) and ICU length of stay (r = 0.238, P < 0.001), and a statistically significant wider in patients who died compared to those who survived (P < 0.001).
conclusionsONSD could be an objective screening method for early diagnosis of SAE, with a cutoff > 5.2 mm. Trial registration NCT05849831 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05849831 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.