Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39815012›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

Prevalence of Current Clinical Leverage and Association with Perceived Coercion in Outpatient and Community Psychiatric Settings: A First in Canada Study.

Arash Nakhost, Frank Sirotich, Alexander I F Simpson, Samuel Law

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arash Nakhost *Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), Toronto Branch, Assistant Professor (Status Only) Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Frank Sirotich *Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), Toronto Branch, Assistant Professor (Status Only) Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexander I F SimpsonDivision of Forensic Psychiatry of the Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Samuel Law *Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Samuel.Law@unityhealth.to.ORCID 0000-0002-1918-8782

Funding

Ontario Academic Health Science Centre Alternate Funding Plan Innovation Funds (SMH-17-008)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical leverages and pressures are often utilized in psychiatric treatment settings. Clinicians know they are controversial but think of them as useful and relatively harmless. Perception of coercion is known to be deleterious to therapeutic relationship and clinical outcomes. We assessed individuals (N = 137) receiving care in outpatient and community psychiatric settings in a Canadian urban center regarding their current experiences of clinical leverage (in finance, housing, access to/custody of children, and family), and perception of coercion. Analyses show clinical leverage are common (34.8% overall), with access to child and family (15.7%), and financial (14.6%) leverages being most common. Generalised linear models indicated that psychiatric symptomology (p < 0.001) and current financial leverage (p = 0.035) were positively associated with perceptions of coercion. The results highlight that clinical leverages are widespread, associated with perception of coercion, and are likely harmful with negative impact on patient care and outcomes. Efforts to mitigate these impacts are needed.

Indexed as

CoercionCommunity Mental Health ServicesMental DisordersAdultAmbulatory CareCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsYoung AdultFinancial pressureLeverageOutpatient psychiatric carePerception of coercionRecovery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.