Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814985›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2025

Practical approach to extracardiac findings in CT and MR for the non-radiologist.

Alan V Godfrey, Erin K Opfer, Neil J Mardis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan V GodfreyDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Erin K OpferDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA. ekopfer@cmh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3141-130X
Neil J MardisDepartment of Radiology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sectional cardiac imaging plays an essential role in the evaluation of pediatric patients with congenital and acquired heart disease. While the focus of cardiac imaging is primarily on evaluating cardiac structures, it also provides valuable insights into extracardiac structures and associated abnormalities. The radiologists and cardiologists interpreting these exams play a critical role in recognizing these findings and providing recommendations for follow-up testing when indicated. Due to the excellent soft tissue resolution of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), incidental findings can often be diagnosed without further imaging. Incidental findings are generally defined as lesions or masses detected by imaging that is performed for a different reason. In other cases, further imaging evaluation and testing may be necessary. This article aims to explore the spectrum of extracardiac findings encountered in pediatric cardiac imaging studies, their clinical significance, and the potential implications for patient care.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildHumansCardiac magnetic resonanceChildrenCongenital heart diseaseExtracardiac findingsIncidental findings

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.