ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2025
Optimal timing for post-dialysis blood pressure measurement: relationship with home blood pressure monitoring.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Post-dialysis blood pressure: inaccuracy or lack of standardization?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In hemodialysis patients, blood pressure (BP) measured at the postdialysis period (POSBP) can be used to diagnose hypertension. However, the optimal time point for POSBP remains uncertain. This cross-sectional study evaluated 210 long-term dialysis patients (66.7% men; age = 56.9 ± 15.7 years), who underwent POSBP measurements at three time points [immediately after dialysis period ended (POSBP1); after blood return (POSBP2) and after fistula hemostasis or catheter sealing (POSBP3)] and home BP monitoring (HBPM) over one week. POSBP1, POSBP2, POSBP3 and HBPM values were 139.1 ± 22.4/73.2 ± 12.5, 142.8 ± 22.8/74.3 ± 12.3, 142.8 ± 21.8/74.0 ± 12.2 and 131.2 ± 21.2/77.9 ± 12.1 mmHg, respectively. Systolic POSBP3 and POSBP2 were significantly greater (p < 0.05) than systolic POSBP1. POSBP3 had the greatest correlation with HBPM, while elevated (>130/80 mmHg) POSBP3 showed the highest numerical accuracy (AUC [95% CI] = 0.696 [0.638-0.754]) and concordance (kappa coefficient = 0.41) with elevated HBPM (≥130/80 mmHg) compared with POSBP1 and POSBP2. These findings suggest that POSBP3 may be a preferable measurement for assessment of POSBP in hemodialysis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39814967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.