ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction and application of optimized model for mine water inflow prediction based on neural network and ARIMA model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mine water influx is a significant geological hazard during mine development, influenced by various factors such as geological conditions, hydrology, climate, and mining techniques. This phenomenon is characterized by non-linearity and high complexity, leading to frequent water accidents in coal mines. These accidents not only impact coal production quality but also jeopardize the safety of mine staff. In order to better predict the amount of water surging in mines and to provide an important basis for mine water damage prevention work, based on the time series data of mine water influx from January 2020 to February 2023 in Northern Guizhou Province Longfeng Coal Mine, the BP-ARIMA prediction model was established by combining the BP neural network model and ARIMA autoregressive sliding average model, It also predicted the mine influx for a total of 6 months from July 2022 to February 2023, and compared the prediction results with four models, namely, BP neural network model, ARIMA autoregressive sliding average model, traditional method of Large well method, and GM(1,1) grey model, and used the absolute relative error as the calculation of model accuracy. The results show that the established BP-ARIMA(3,1,1) prediction model is much closer to the actual value, with an average absolute relative error of 1.02% and a maximum absolute relative error of 3.036%, and the goodness of fit R² was 0.93, which is much better than the other four single models, and substantially improves the prediction accuracy of mine water influx. Furthermore, utilizing the BP-ARIMA model, future predictions for mine water influx in Longfeng Mine were made, offering a scientific foundation for effective prevention and control measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.