ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting pentafecta outcomes before and after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers among men worldwide, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a widely used treatment for localized PCa. Achieving pentafecta outcomes, which include continence, potency, cancer control, free surgical margins, and no major complications, is a critical measure of surgical success and long-term prognosis. However, predicting these outcomes remains challenging. In this retrospective, single-center study, we analyzed data from 1,752 patients who underwent RARP for localized prostate adenocarcinoma between August 2009 and April 2023. The pentafecta outcome was achieved in 290 patients (16.6%). Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral nerve sparing significantly increased the likelihood of achieving the pentafecta outcome (odds ratio 10.36, 95% CI: 5.75-18.66; p < 0.001). Preoperative potency and bilateral nerve sparing were also identified as key predictors. Nomograms were developed using preoperative and postoperative variables, including age, PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, pathological tumor stage, tumor grade, nerve sparing, and preoperative potency. Internal validation of the nomograms was performed using bootstrapping methods, demonstrating robust predictive performance. These nomograms provide valuable tools for personalized surgical planning and patient counseling and may be applicable to broader populations, given the inclusion of universally recognized predictive factors and rigorous validation. This study presents the development and validation of nomograms to predict pentafecta outcomes before and after RARP. These nomograms provide valuable tools for clinicians to estimate the likelihood of achieving postoperative pentafecta outcomes. Incorporating these nomograms into clinical practice may improve patient counseling and shared decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.