ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating nonlinear dynamic properties of an inertial sensor with rotational velocity-dependent rigidity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the nonlinear dynamics of a system with frequency-dependent stiffness using a MEMS-based capacitive inertial sensor as a case study. The sensor is positioned directly on a rotating component of a machine and consists of a microbeam clamped at both ends by fixed supports with a fixed central proof mass. The nonlinear behavior is determined by electrostatic forces, axial and bending motion coupling, and frequency-dependent stiffness. The numerical Galerkin approach is employed for discretization of the coupled differential equations in spatial coordinates. To obtain the sensor response as a function of frequency, a continuation arc-length method based on weak formulation energy balance method is used. This approach uses a physical gradient descent learning based method to obtain unknown coefficients of the considered response. The presented method computes the periodic steady-state solution of the design by considering different frequency contents within the response, including different harmonics of the response expansion. However, the primary and secondary resonances at various harmonic frequencies within the response can be predicted. In this article, the dynamic behavior of the design is investigated by testing different levels of shaft acceleration and different bias voltages. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine the frequency-dependent stiffness of the accelerometer for different levels of shaft speed, taking into account various sensor geometric parameters. The analysis demonstrates the behavior of the sensors under different conditions, particularly highlighting the nonlinearity of the sensor, which causes primary and secondary resonances in the first, second, and third harmonic responses of the accelerometer, especially at higher bias voltages. Fast Fourier analyses indicated that the transversal vibration amplitude of the structure in the second and third harmonies are so considerable that cannot be neglected. The mathematical method used in this study can be applied by researchers and engineers in the design of such sensors to effectively create these devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.