ArticleScientific reports2025
Erythrocyte modified controlling nutritional status as a biomarker for predicting poor prognosis in post-surgery breast cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer patients by using nutrition-based index: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Predicting the Effectiveness of 2 Chemotherapy Regimens Applied to Breast Cancer Patients by Nutritional and Inflammatory Status.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive marker for breast cancer treatment outcomes: a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrition and inflammation are closely related to prognosis in breast cancer patients. However, current nutritional and inflammatory measures predict disease free survival (DFS) of breast cancer are still different, and the most predictive measures remain unknown. This study aimed to compare the predictive effects of commonly used nutritional and inflammatory measures on DFS and to improve existing nutritional or inflammatory measures in order to develop a new model that is more effective for predicting postoperative recurrence and metastasis in breast cancer patients. The clinical data of 536 female breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma who underwent surgery at Shaoxing People's Hospital from January 2012 to December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The predictive effects of nutritional and inflammatory indicators on DFS were evaluated. Machine learning was used to evaluate and rank laboratory indicators, select relatively important variables to modify nutritional or inflammatory indicators with the best predictive power, and evaluate their predictive role in patients' postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Among various metrics predicting DFS, the CONUT score emerged paramount with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.667. Interestingly, the combination of the erythrocyte levels with the CONUT score (ECONUT) achieved the highest AUC (0.722). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the group exhibiting high ECONUT scores experiencing a notably poorer DFS. ECONUT was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative DFS (P < 0.001). The ECONUT model could provide an effective assessment tool for predicting DFS in breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.