Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Extracting organs of interest from medical images based on convolutional neural network with auxiliary and refined constraints.

Fenghui Lian, Yingjie Sun, Meiyu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fenghui LianSchool of Aviation Operations and Services, Air Force Aviation University, Changchun, 130000, China.
Yingjie SunSchool of Aviation Operations and Services, Air Force Aviation University, Changchun, 130000, China.
Meiyu LiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200336, China. limy022@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately extracting organs from medical images provides radiologist with more comprehensive evidences to clinical diagnose, which offers up a higher accuracy and efficiency. However, the key to achieving accurate segmentation lies in abundant clues for contour distinction, which has a high demand for the network architecture design and its practical training status. To this end, we design auxiliary and refined constraints to optimize the energy function by supplying additional guidance in training procedure, thus promoting model's ability to capture information. Specifically, for the auxiliary constraint, a set of convolutional structures are involved into a conventional network to act as a discriminator, then adversarial network is established. Based on the obtained architecture, we further build adversarial mechanism by introducing a second discriminator into segmentor for refinement. The involvement of refined constraint contributes to ameliorate training situation, optimize model performance, and boost its ability of collecting information for segmentation. We evaluate the proposed framework on two public databases (NIH Pancreas-CT and MICCAI Sliver07). Experimental results show that the proposed network achieves comparable performance to current pancreas segmentation algorithms and outperforms most state-of-the-art liver segmentation methods. The obtained results on public datasets sufficiently demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model for organ segmentation.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverPancreasAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedAuxiliary constraintConvolutional neural networkOrgan segmentationRefined constraint

Identifiers

PMID39814795
PMCPMC11736126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.