ArticleScientific reports2025
Behavior modeling for a new flexure-based mechanism by Hunger Game Search and physics-guided artificial neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A temperature prediction model for aluminum smelting furnaces considering dynamic temporal and spatial features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Monolithic scalable compliant mechanisms.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compliant mechanism has some advantages and has been widely applied in many accurate positioning systems. However, modeling the compliant mechanism behavior has suffered from many challenges, such as unstable results, and the limitation of training data set. In the field of compliant mechanism modeling, there has been no research interested in applying meta-heuristics optimization algorithms to optimize the weights and biases of the neural network globally. Additionally, the Physics-Guided Artificial Neural Network, a research direction that has received much attention recently, has not been considered in problems related to compliant mechanisms. In order to surmount those drawbacks, this paper pioneers a new approach to model behaviors of a compliant mechanism using the Hunger Game Search and the Physics-Guided Artificial Neural Network. The Hunger Game Search can directly search the model's weights and biases so that the target function that takes advantages of both physical and data information can be minimized. The investigations on diverse training set ratios and the ANOVA tests at the [Formula: see text] significance level reveal that using the Hunger Game Search can result in smaller errors than using the backpropagation method. Furthermore, applying the Hunger Game Search to a Physics-Guided Artificial Neural Network not only can reduce error but also can increase convergence speed compared to applying Hunger Game Search to conventional neural networks. Those results demonstrate the potential of the proposed method in modeling the behavior of compliant mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.