ArticleScientific reports2025
Unsupervised domain adaptation teacher-student network for retinal vessel segmentation via full-resolution refined model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unpaired image to image translation for source free domain adaptation in semantic segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Universal Vessel Segmentation for Multi-Modality Retinal Images.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal blood vessels are the only blood vessels in the human body that can be observed non-invasively. Changes in vessel morphology are closely associated with hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other systemic diseases, and computers can help doctors identify these changes by automatically segmenting blood vessels in fundus images. If we train a highly accurate segmentation model on one dataset (source domain) and apply it to another dataset (target domain) with a different data distribution, the segmentation accuracy will drop sharply, which is called the domain shift problem. This paper proposes a novel unsupervised domain adaptation method to address this problem. It uses a teacher-student framework to generate pseudo labels for the target domain image, and trains the student network with a combination of source domain loss and domain adaptation loss; finally, the weights of the teacher network are updated from the exponential moving average of the student network and used for the target domain segmentation. We reconstructed the encoder and decoder of the network into a full-resolution refined model by computing the training loss at multiple semantic levels and multiple label resolutions. We validated our method on two publicly available datasets DRIVE and STARE. From STARE to DRIVE, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 0.9633, 0.8616,and 0.9733, respectively. From DRIVE to STARE, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are 0.9687, 0.8470, and 0.9785, respectively. Our method outperforms most state-of-the-art unsupervised methods. Compared with domain adaptation methods, our method also has the best F1 score (0.8053) from STARE to DRIVE and a competitive F1 score (0.8001) from DRIVE to STARE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.