Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39814707›Full record

ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025

Flexible micromachined ultrasound transducers (MUTs) for biomedical applications.

Sanjog Vilas Joshi, Sina Sadeghpour, Nadezda Kuznetsova, Chen Wang, Michael Kraft

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances in transducers for through-tissue ultrasonic power transfer.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanjog Vilas JoshiDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), KU Leuven, Belgium. sanjogvilas.joshi@kuleuven.be.
Sina SadeghpourDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), KU Leuven, Belgium. sina.sadeghpour@kuleuven.be.
Nadezda KuznetsovaDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), KU Leuven, Belgium.
Chen WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), KU Leuven, Belgium. chen.wang@kuleuven.be.
Michael KraftDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), KU Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

KU Leuven (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) ZKD-6578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of bulk piezoelectric transducer arrays in medical imaging is a well-established technology that operates based on thickness mode piezoelectric vibration. Meanwhile, advancements in fabrication techniques have led to the emergence of micromachined alternatives, namely, piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer (PMUT) and capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT). These devices operate in flexural mode using piezoelectric thin films and electrostatic forces, respectively. In addition, the development of flexible ultrasound transducers based on these principles has opened up new possibilities for biomedical applications, including biomedical imaging, sensing, and stimulation. This review provides a detailed discussion of the need for flexible micromachined ultrasound transducers (MUTs) and potential applications, their specifications, materials, fabrication, and electronics integration. Specifically, the review covers fabrication approaches and compares the performance specifications of flexible PMUTs and CMUTs, including resonance frequency, sensitivity, flexibility, and other relevant factors. Finally, the review concludes with an outlook on the challenges and opportunities associated with the realization of efficient MUTs with high performance and flexibility.

Identifiers

PMID39814707
PMCPMC11736036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.