ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2025
Effect of Characteristic Inflammatory and Structural Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesions on Expert Assessment of Axial Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.
Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex differences in clinical and imaging characteristics of axial juvenile spondyloarthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the influence of pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings on axial disease assessment in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA).
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of patients with JSpA with suspected axial disease. Three experts reviewed each case and rated their confidence (-3 to +3) in the presence of axial disease, first with clinical data and second with clinical and MRI data. Agreement was defined as ≥ 2/3 clinical experts with a rating of ≤ -1 or ≥ 1, and high confidence agreement as ≤ -2 or ≥ 2. The association of clinical features and both global assessments was tested with modified Poisson regression models.
resultsTwo hundred seventy-two of 303 cases (89.8%) achieved agreement with clinical data alone. Adding imaging data affected agreement in 38.9% (118/303) and directionality of agreement in 23.4% (71/303). Agreement was facilitated in 26/31 cases and lost in 21/272 cases. Of those 71 cases that changed directionality, 33 changed from axial disease being absent to present and 38 from present to absent. The final model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.93 and 3 factors were independently associated with expert agreement (HLA-B27: relative risk [RR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.14-1.74; pain improvement with activity: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.54; and bone marrow edema on MRI: RR 4.08, 95% CI 2.91-5.73).
conclusionThe addition of imaging data affected directionality and improved high confidence agreement of expert assessment of axial disease. These results underscore the integral role of MRI in the determination of axial disease in JSpA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.